Writing in Textured Dimensions

Writing does not occur two-demesnionally; It is a multi-textured and multi-layered process. Even the 2-D plane of woodpulp and print stratums and worms through multiple dimensions: Texts are built on intertextual flesh.

Multimodal composition complicates the dynamic of the writing classroom. Since arguments can be formed using text, audio, and visuals, invariably, there will be instructors and administrators that say, "Teaching a student to write using only pen and paper is difficult enough. So, how do you expect to teach students to write using other forms of literacy, when they are not savvy enough to write just using one mode?" My answer to this question is writing in the multimodal classroom is much more natural.

In many ways simple ink and pulp methods of writing do not connect to the visceral, especially with students in FYC. Though language creates an aural sensation, even unspoken, it does not engage the senses as actively as a text created using the various forms available in the multimodal class. Artifacts created in these classrooms are more sensual, touching on the textual, visual, and aural sensibilities of both reader and writer.

Because the texts are more engaging, the composer (not sure if writer is the correct word) would be using means that are more accessible. Regardless of the accessibility, these texts become more kinetic and complex. The hypertextul and intertextual elements in a multimodal composition make apparent the social nature of writing, situating the students as, both, artist and critic.